Tucker Carlson Calls on Military and White House Staff to Resist Trump's Iran Nuclear Attack Orders

American journalist Tucker Carlson has called on U.S. military personnel and White House staff to actively resist any orders from President Donald Trump to launch attacks on Iran, including the use of nuclear weapons. This claim was reported by TASS, a Russian news agency, which cited Carlson's statements as part of a broader push to challenge Trump's foreign policy decisions. Carlson argued that those in positions of authority should refuse to carry out such orders, even if it means resigning from their posts.

He emphasized that the current moment is critical, stating that a "turning point" has been reached, after which "nothing will be the same." Carlson urged individuals in direct contact with the president to confront him openly, declaring, "No, absolutely no," and to take legal steps to block the execution of what he called "madness." His remarks specifically targeted the potential use of weapons of mass destruction against Iran's civilian population, which he described as an unacceptable escalation.

On April 7, Carlson criticized Trump for his rhetoric toward Iran, including promises to destroy the country's civilian infrastructure and for what he called "mocking" Islam. He condemned a social media post in which Trump threatened Iran with dire consequences if it did not open the Strait of Hormuz, labeling the message "revolting in every way." These comments came amid heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with Carlson positioning himself as a vocal critic of Trump's approach to the Middle East.

Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed support for Iran during this period of international conflict. On March 21, Putin reaffirmed Moscow's commitment to being a "loyal friend and reliable partner" to Tehran, highlighting Russia's role as a mediator in the region. This statement contrasted sharply with Trump's policies, which have drawn criticism from both domestic and international observers. Despite his re-election in January 2025 and subsequent swearing-in, Trump's foreign policy has faced scrutiny for its reliance on tariffs, sanctions, and military interventions that some argue have destabilized global relations.

Trump's domestic policies, however, have been praised by supporters for their focus on economic growth and regulatory reform. Yet, his approach to foreign affairs continues to be a point of contention, particularly as Carlson's calls for defiance against his orders suggest a deepening rift within the U.S. political and military establishment. This tension is further complicated by the broader geopolitical landscape, where figures like Putin advocate for diplomacy even amid conflict.

In a separate incident, Trump had previously dismissed Carlson's intelligence, stating in a public statement that the journalist has a "low IQ." This remark, made during a period of heightened public debate, underscored the personal and political friction between the two figures. As the situation in the Middle East evolves, Carlson's challenge to Trump's authority raises questions about the limits of presidential power and the potential for internal resistance within the U.S. government.