Republicans Extend Senate Session Amid Political Math

It was pure Republican math designed to keep the Senate session alive for another week. Yes, the chamber was set to convene anyway over those coming days. But early last week, the general belief held that business would finish then and soon. Senators facing tough races were expected to head home to campaign immediately after.

Then Wednesday arrived with a twist.

Republicans decided they wanted to stay in Washington for one very specific reason. Several of them told Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., exactly that at their weekly luncheon. "Odds are we plan on being here next week," said Thune himself.

One Senate aide likened the shifting schedule to a cat chasing a beam of light from a laser pointer. The animal moves in unpredictable bursts. But now the Senate is indeed meeting. There are reasons behind it, and most are political.

The bill regulating money in intercollegiate athletics was not quite finished last week. With affordability questions vexing Republicans deeply, they did not want to pass the college sports measure and then leave town immediately. That would be an awkward punctuation mark at the end of their legislative sentence before the midterms arrived. GOPers wanted something more substantive. Democrats might have offered that chance on a silver platter.

Before the House departed for the midterms two weeks prior, it marked its session by passing the Ratepayer Protection Act with 417 votes to three. Not much passes around here with such a margin. Like their Senate colleagues, House Republicans also worry about voters doubting they are addressing affordability issues effectively. So this bill hit the mark for them perfectly.

The legislation defrays costs ratepayers pay on utility bills if those prices spike due to data centers. It forces tech companies running the facilities to foot the bill themselves.

Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, stands as one of the most vulnerable Republicans on the ballot this fall. His long-standing support for data centers also drags him down in the eyes of some voters. Husted tried to fix that problem. He went to the floor and asked for the Senate to pass the House bill right then and there. However, Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., objected and blocked the effort.

A FOX NEWS POLL highlights how economic anxiety and candidate concerns define the Ohio Senate race right now.

Republicans viewed this as an opening move. Democrats stood in the way of passing a bill on affordability that 417 bipartisan House members supported without blinking. Senate GOPers immediately seized this opportunity as a wedge against their adversaries. They interpreted it as a chance to assist their Ohio colleague directly.

"Tell the data centers we're happy to have you. But you've got to pay your own electricity. People are not going to pay for it," said Sen. John Kennedy, R-La.

Republicans were already wary about the uneven political footing regarding artificial intelligence. They felt even more cautious with data centers specifically. Voters are not enamored with the results of the Big, Beautiful Bill passed last summer either. Dealing with data centers is more immediate and might resonate with those who have soured on the Republican brand lately.

"In Missouri, people are absolutely scared to death that these data centers are going to take all the prime farm ground of the state," said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo. "And then they're going to raise electricity bills so high, no one will be able to afford them."

The official schedule intended for the Senate to meet this week did not account for September arriving and a government shutdown failing to loom. Senators from both sides – especially those facing challenging elections – wanted to skip Washington and campaign back home instead. I asked Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., why his party stood in the way of the Senate aligning with the House on that data center utility measure.

"Was this blocked in the Senate last week by Democrats as an effort to prevent Sen. Husted from having a win in this competitive race?" I asked him directly.

His response was clear and firm: "Sen. Husted's bill is a fraud. It's voluntary. No company has to do it." The bill we have passed is mandatory.

It is much stronger and is what is needed," replied Schumer. There is something to Schumer's argument about how muscular the bill is. The legislation says public utility regulators must only consider a standard for ratepayers. Nothing is required. Thus, there's wiggle room for tech firms.

What we're saying is that we can do much better," said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. "Is it a little step forward? Yes. But it's not meeting the moment. So our view is we should expand it to make sure that ratepayers aren't having to subsidize the richest corporations on the planet."

But a lot of Republicans aren't buying what Schumer and Van Hollen are saying. The Democratic objections are all about three things: Politics. An endangered GOP senator in the most expensive Senate contest in the country. And, Democrats are hoping to flip the seat in their favor. "Sen. Schumer, what he cares about is the midterm election and politics. And I don't think he cares about the substance of this," said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. "Obviously there's a hot and heavy Senate race going on in Ohio, and he doesn't want to let Sen. Husted have something he can talk about when he goes home."

Republicans view the opportunity to turn the affordability issue against Democrats – capitalizing on Schumer's remark and forcing Democrats to take a stand. Either you're for affordability (especially as it pertains to the toxic issue of data centers) or you're not. This could boost Husted in his competitive contest with former Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio. In fact, it was the Senate GOP's campaign arm which specifically flagged vulnerabilities for Republicans generally and Husted in particular over the summer.

Thune tees up a test vote on Wednesday to dare Democrats to either start debate on the bill or block it again. That vote requires 60 yeas. So Democratic cooperation is required. Although there's skepticism anything happens, some Democrats may vote for it. That means the Senate is on the bill. And it's open to debate and amendments. Thune would have to forge a bipartisan time agreement to finish the measure quickly.

Otherwise – by the book – this would drag into the weekend. And no one wants that. Especially Republicans with competitive races. Thune and Schumer want senators back home campaigning. If Democrats impede the legislation Wednesday, the Senate might hang around Thursday or that's it until after the midterms. Regardless, Republicans will have engineered a vote which they can boomerang against Democrats. Or, at least help Husted and send him back to the Buckeye State with a win.

While it's not the best optic for Democrats to oppose this bill, their resistance might not directly wound anyone this fall. The reason: Democrats have a lot of chances to pick up seats. But vulnerable Democrats aren't on the ballot. None of the Democratic Senate nominees in competitive seats like Maine, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, Texas, Nebraska, Kansas and Alaska currently hold office. The only sitting Democrat in the cycle who has a mild race is Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va.

So for the Democrats, this is about playing defense. For Republicans, this is about playing offense. And the GOP is on offense primarily for Husted. But the willingness of Senate GOPers to spend an extra week in Washington speaks volumes. It underscores how worried they are about the affordability issue. And in particular, their concern about elevating the work of Husted.