Mother Brings Son's Ashes to Court After Mental Health Struggles

A supporter of Lindsay Clancy arrived at court carrying her son's ashes after he ended his own life last year. Danielle Buckley, 53, told reporters that Evan suffered from oppositional defiant disorder and a long history of angry moods. He faced resistance toward authority figures before taking his own life in 2024 following mental health struggles.

Buckley said she was put on medication at age 22 for depression and anxiety. She received five or six prescriptions over the years. 'I mean, I was on so many medications that I couldn't even keep track of them all,' she admitted. Buckley shared her own terrifying battle with mental illness. She made her children start taking showers because she struggled with similar issues herself.

'I never thought about taking my children, but there was a day where I thought I can't keep living like this,' Buckley explained. She felt a deep identification with Clancy after both women were shuffled through the healthcare system before Evan died. 'I just want her to not be guilty,' she said regarding the defendant.

The jury will begin deliberations today on first-degree murder charges against Clancy, 36. Prosecutors seek a conviction for killing Cora, five, Dawson, three, and Callan, eight months at their Duxbury, Massachusetts home in January 2023. Judge William R Sullivan allowed manslaughter to be added to the instructions alongside second-degree murder yesterday.

Clancy has admitted to killing her children but pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity. She cited postpartum psychosis as a defense and wants commitment to a state mental health facility instead of prison. The trial lasted five weeks before closing arguments from both sides.

Buckley believes the healthcare system is the real problem. 'So many people fall through the cracks. My son fell through the cracks,' she noted. She hopes Clancy does not face a guilty verdict because Buckley thinks the defendant has already paid her price.

The courtroom was packed with dozens of media members on this latest day. Experts presented opposing psychiatric assessments regarding whether Clancy could understand her actions. One defense expert claimed she lost control completely, while another prosecution witness said there were no signs of psychosis. This battle defines whether Clancy bears criminal responsibility for the deaths of her three children.

If you or someone you know needs help, call or text 988 in the US anytime. An online chat is also available at 988lifeline.org.

The courtroom has expanded to make room for more media coverage. Timothy Cruz from the Massachusetts District Attorney's office sits behind the prosecution table. This is his only time here besides previous opening sessions and the moment Buckingham questioned Sue Clancy about 'mortal sin.' His office made the decision to prosecute her. A row of Massachusetts State Police officers stands nearby, several having already testified for the state. Nurses just wheeled Lindsay Clancy into the room. She wears a pale blue blouse. Her parents, Mike and Paula Musgrove, are present as they have been every single day. Her sister Allison Ozga is not in attendance. Reddington's son Patrick Reddington sits with her parents alongside Whitey Bulger's attorney JW Carney, Dr Paul Zeizel, a family friend, and other defense experts. ADA Shanan Buckingham wears a black bow in her hair.

At 13:17, massive crowds have gathered outside the courthouse. Kevin Reddington arrives at court for closing arguments by 13:15. Five weeks of grueling testimony from more than 75 witnesses are over. Lindsay Clancy's fate now rests with 12 jurors in a murder trial that first captivated the nation and then the world. We have covered this case since day one, calling it 'America's saddest murder trial.' Get all our coverage sent to your inbox. Patrick Clancy faces a secret crisis while his ex-wife waits for her verdict. He is hundreds of miles away in Manhattan touring apartments with new wife Dr Rachel Danis. They seek to escape the glare of publicity.

Behind doors inside this pre-Civil War psychiatric facility, the former nurse who once cared for patients has become the patient herself. Confined to a wheelchair, she receives round-the-clock care for physical and mental health issues. Her defense claims a severe episode of postpartum psychosis and depression caused her condition. Closing arguments are set for Thursday. The judge gave the prosecution and defense about an hour each for their final case. Then the jury will begin deliberations on Clancy's fate. While 18 jurors sat through the five-week trial, only 12 will make the decision. Jury members do not know who is deciding or who was an alternate until deliberations start.

Rep Tony Pope, the prosecutor who put killer mom Susan Smith behind bars, predicted a surprising outcome. He believes female jurors who are mothers could deliver a twist. Pope now serves as speaker pro tempore of the South Carolina House. He previously prosecuted Susan Smith in 1994 for murdering her two sons, Michael and Alexander. Smith was just 22 years old when she strapped her young boys into the back seat of her car. She drove it down a ramp into John D Long Lake in Union. She watched for six agonizing minutes as the vehicle filled with water and sank to the bottom.

The judge ruled that Lindsay Clancy can be found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder. With all evidence presented and the final witness off the stand, Judge William Sullivan held a charging conference Wednesday. He gave jurors options beyond murder, which carries a life sentence. Three charges are now on the table: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter. It was not specified which form of manslaughter applies. The community watches closely as this case moves toward its conclusion.

Lindsay Clancy's legal team is calling the probe a mess. They say it is botched. Puzzling questions remain unanswered as the jury prepares to decide. This case has drawn heavy attention across the nation. Some call it America's saddest murder trial. The defense previously wanted an involuntary manslaughter charge instead of murder. Now they argue the facts are not clear enough for a guilty verdict on first-degree murder.

Attorney Kevin Reddington told the judge that instructions should reflect how weak the police work was. He asked for a chance to present this view before deliberations begin. The lawyer claimed investigators basically accepted she strangled the children and then stopped looking. They moved on too fast, he said. This approach left gaps in the evidence.

The prosecution faces a tough hurdle here. They must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Yet the defense insists reasonable doubt exists. They point to missing details about how the deaths happened. Without answers, a jury cannot be sure of her intent. The outcome could change everything for Clancy and her family.